Real Estate

No Commission Without Consideration: The Legal Pitfalls of Exclusivity Agreements in Property Sales

In the dynamic world of real estate transactions, exclusivity agreements play a pivotal role in securing deals and protecting the interests of brokers and their clients. These agreements, often entered into between a broker and a prospective buyer or seller, grant exclusive rights to the broker to represent the client in a specific transaction or within a defined timeframe. Exclusivity agreements establish a legal relationship between a broker and a client, granting the broker exclusive rights to represent the client in buying or selling real estate.

While exclusivity agreements offer significant benefits, they must be carefully crafted with proper consideration to withstand potential legal challenges. Consideration is a fundamental principle in contract law that refers to something of value exchanged between parties to a contract. In the context of exclusivity agreements in property sales, consideration is crucial as it ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable. Without valid consideration, an exclusivity agreement may be deemed unenforceable in a court of law.

In a recent Massachusetts case, one broker learned this lesson the hard way. The court confirmed that brokers are generally entitled to commissions only if the broker is the predominating cause of the property sale. While Massachusetts courts recognize that a broker may be entitled to a commission under different circumstances, there must be consideration to uphold exclusivity agreements. This means that if a seller sells a property independent of the broker, and the language of the exclusivity agreement does not provide for a commission under other circumstances, the exclusivity agreement may be declared legally invalid. In those instances, the broker will not benefit from the exclusivity agreement at issue. Such was the case for this particular broker, who did not meaningfully participate in the sale of the property and was instead deemed a passive recipient of the potential benefits of the exclusivity agreement.

In the realm of real estate transactions, exclusivity agreements serve as valuable tools for brokers to secure business opportunities. However, those business opportunities could be lost without proper consideration to ensure the validity and enforceability of these agreements. By understanding the importance of consideration and crafting agreements that align with legal requirements and fair practices, brokers can navigate property sales transactions in a manner effective for all involved parties.

Published by
Casey Sack

Recent Posts

The Meaning of At-Will Employment in Massachusetts

The at-will employment doctrine is a double-edged sword in the workplace, offering both freedom and…

1 week ago

Rudolph Friedmann Wins Martha’s Vineyard Real Estate Dispute

Jon Friedmann obtained a favorable verdict from the Massachusetts Superior Court after a three-day jury-waived…

1 week ago

Alex Tsianatelis Quoted in “Landlord’s alleged breach doesn’t justify end of rent payments” in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

A Massachusetts court recently decided a case involving a commercial lease agreement dispute, which determined…

1 month ago

Rudolph Friedmann Elevates Alexander Tsianatelis to Partner

Rudolph Friedmann is pleased to announce Alexander Tsianatelis has been named a partner at the…

1 month ago

Court Orders Contractor to Pay Attorney’s Fees Under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 231, § 6F

Jon Friedmann and Casey Sack successfully secured a decision under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 231,…

2 months ago

Good Fences Make Good Neighbors … So Do Clear and Concise Intentions: An Examination of Tools That Give a Party the Right to Control Property They No Longer Own

A selling party owned two adjacent oceanfront homes in a scenic community in Massachusetts. The…

2 months ago